177. Olaf Scholz: Putin, Power, and Far-Right Populism
23 February 2026
Post
16 December 2010
177. Olaf Scholz: Putin, Power, and Far-Right Populism
Does the former German Chancellor think that Germany was wrong to rely on Russian gas in the run up to the war in Ukraine? What does Olaf Scholz think is behind the rise of the far-right Alternative f... Continue23 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
23 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
503. Andrew’s Arrest: What Next?
Why has the disgraced Andrew Mountbatten Windsor been arrested? How damaging is this unprecedented moment for the royal family? How effective was King Charles’ response? Join Alastair and the forme... Continue19 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
502. How Nigel Farage Gets Away With It (Question Time)
Why is Reform UK's leader not being properly challenged by the press, and how does he get away with it? What does this reveal about the international populist playbook? How can our democracies be bett... Continue19 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
176. How Close Are We To War With Iran? (Robert Malley)
How does the former US Special Representative for Iran think US-Iranian relations will improve? Is there a method to Trump’s madness when it comes to foreign policy? Why does Robert believe the “t... Continue16 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
501. Is Starmer Too Soft on Trump? Inside the Munich Security Conference
Why did Trump's Secretary of State Marco Rubio 'love bomb' Europe at the Munich Security Conference, and how did it compare to JD Vance's infamous 'enemy within' speech this time last year? Is Europe ... Continue16 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
13 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
500. Japan, China, and the Fight for Taiwan (Question Time)
Are Japan and China closer to conflict over Taiwan, after the landslide victory for Japan's 'Iron Lady', Sanae Takayichi? Does Trump’s crumbling American-Hispanic vote explain his extreme reaction t... Continue12 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
They are gambling with peoples jobs and gambling with the livelihoods of millions of families and from where im sitting i dont fancy the odds they are offering.
Great post – ‘such’ spelt ‘succh’ on the first line though… 🙂
They will need plan B. And possibly plans C, D, E. ,,,,
But they won’t be alone. Lots of us are in full plan B mode as Tory ideology scuppers our employment. And praying that the said plan B pays off.
We are all in this together after all.
Is it not significant that the first unemployment figures under Tory ‘rule’ show an increase? Their plans gamble that we will be content to lose our full time jobs and accept part time work in Argos – don’t think that’s a plan, it’s a lie and a poor quality lie at that
Trying as hard as I can to stay on topic, The Birmingham Post reports that after protests Tory Solihull Council has come up with plan B for making cuts at its crematorium.
Plan A?
Carry out multiple cremations – i.e. roast two or three bodies at once to save gas.
Now, having lost my dad in May, having had a very private family gathering to scatter his ashes, I can say that we placed quite a lot of faith in our Cremation service next door in Brum.
Much as a devout Christian takes sacrament in the faith that the biscuit and the wine are the body and blood of Christ – not merely a representation – we rather hoped that when we scattered dad’s ashes it stood a good chance of actually being him.
Not Mrs Jones or Mr Smith or a bag of chicken sweepings or some mixture thereof.
The ancients learned that it was a good idea to let people treat their dead with dignity. Some Tories in local government, it seems, do not think so.
Ha ha. This made me smile! Glad to see you illustrious types have Jonah days too! Maybe civil servants not such a bad idea – have always previously balked at such invisible, unaccountable power…..
George Osborne has in his misguided courage boasted that there is no Plan B.
But he should realize that Britain is not yet out of danger zone. The financial crisis is only in its first phase. If we continue with the “centre ground” neoliberalism, there will soon be even bigger crisis.
Neoliberalism is not based on any solid empirical or theoretical foundation. In fact, it is based on double fallacy of self-regulating markets and rational economic actor.
With low interest rates and sovereign debt the central banks and governments will be lacking in means to combat the next crisis.
If we want to save western-style capitalism, there must be a more active role for state in the economy and more regulation. Basel III rules are not enough.
Britain´s economy is now growing because of Labour´s measures. Next year the growth will slow. There will be cuts and rise in VAT to 20%.
Unemployment is now 2.5m. And about 390,000 public sector jobs will be cut. Yet George Osborne believes that private sector will be able to create 2.5m new jobs!
Cabinet secretary´s Plan B is more than welcome. My guess is that Mr Osborne will need a new round of quantitative easing from BoE. He will also be forced to make changes to his reckless cuts.
Pro-active industrial policy is needed to rebalance Britain´s economy after the Tories destroyed much of the traditional manufacturing in the 1980s.
The coalition has conned a lot of people into believing that Labour caused the deficit by overspending on public services. As I showed yesterday, this is not the case.
Britain is not Greece – never has been. There is no economic rationale for huge cuts. They will, in all probability, only increase the deficit.
What is needed is a strategy for growth and jobs. Stamped money could be a good idea. A recovery loan could be used to infrastructure projects.
The coalition´s cuts are ideological because David Cameron has admitted that they will not be reversed when the books have been balanced.
Ralph Miliband said that state can never tame capitalism. Tony Crosland believed that this could be done.
Labour must come up with a new economic model based on state activism and more regulation of the financial sector.
If the coalition does not abandon neoliberalism and change its economic policy, only the God that I do will be able to help Britain.
This is worth a watch…
http://falseeconomy.org.uk/blog/video-a-brilliant-demolition-of-osbornes-austerity-economics
And Brown didn’t take a huge gamble with the economy? And lost?
Oh no, forgot, it was the bankers wot did it.
…and who is taking a gamble with higher education? Perhaps you don’t feel that you have the right or inclination to comment..