The risks in getting balance between human rights and Chinese trade and power

  • Post

  • 28 June 2011

  • Posted by Alastair Campbell

  • 18

Not speaking a word of Mandarin, I find it hard to work out exactly how hacked off Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao was with David Cameron's stance on human rights yesterday. 'Finger-pointing' is certainly not an everyday diplomatic word, but I just have to think of the foreign languages I do know to realise how difficult it would be to translate. In diplomacy, the tone can be as important as the words themselves, and the interpretation can only tell you so much; one other factor - was it the media he was accusing of finger-pointing, or Mr Cameron? Tony Blair was always sensitive to the twin pressures of a China that did not like being lectured, and of pressure groups, Parliamentarians and strands of public opinion which wanted the lectures to be delivered very sternly indeed. Cameron is equally sensitive to them, I have no doubt, and the tensions could be heard in his comments at yesterday's press conference. But if you had to state in which direction his rhetoric and body language were pointing, I would say marginally in favour of human rights. TB, as my diaries recall, was probably pointing slightly the other way. The FT front page story today contains anonymous quotes from Chinese officials suggesting Britain is paying an economic price already for Mr Cameron's stance. You just need to flick through the rest of the paper to see why China matters so much more than it used to. Pages 1, 3 and 5 of the main paper, the main feature on the inside back page, (Global Pioneers of 'China Inc') and the second lead of the Companies and Markets section are basically about China and the economy. Cameron clearly prides himself on a leadership style capable of standing up to anyone - defence chiefs at home, or fellow leaders from abroad, even those as powerful as the Chinese. It is clearly right to stand up for human rights. But at a time when economic recovery is his core objective, it is also a risk. Plenty of new deals were signed yesterday. But I wonder how many in the future may go unsigned if the Chinese Premier's words and tone were accurately translated, and he leaves the UK with a broadly unfavourable impression. *** Talking of fearsome opponents capable of unsettling Prime Ministers, may I wish the Women's Insitute well in their campaign to save local libraries. Their encounter with the last Prime Minister but one is a highlight of volume 3, Power and Responsibility, out July 7. It is a memory still capable of making me laugh and shiver at the same time. Ps, don't read too much into the blue cover.

18 responses to “The risks in getting balance between human rights and Chinese trade and power”

  1. just for once Cameron deserves a few brownie points. While the rest of Europe appears to have never heard of Ai WeiWei Cameron continues to tell China that they have to do better. You have to take the long view with China and social change in China will come because it is pushed by the Brits rather than sacrificed to blind economic gain.

  2. I have many, many, many, many complaints about David Cameron, but standing up for human rights isn’t going to be one of them. Its pursuit becomes meaningless if switched on and off, according to economic self interest.

    The issue, surely, is that all of China’s trading partners should take a principled stand on human rights. Then Wen wouldn’t be singling out Britain for his displeasure and perhaps the speed of reform would accelerate.

  3. I like the cover …not because it is blue (though it is a nicer colour than the brown of volumes 1 and 2) but because the design is nice. I have ordered it and will be badgering you to sign it. 

  4.  I think your mate Tony had a bit of a blind spot about human rights.. I agree China’s wealth and growth are important to all of us, but so are the values of a country.

  5. I loved the line in Simon Hoggart’s sketch today about how the Chinese PM was trying to show he was like the British by  saying he read Shakespeare, and Hogart pointing out that Brits don’t read it

  6. But not that many from this Robert, trust me!

    While many were cooking yesterday i took my brother in law and sister to see his Welsh family in Tonyrefail in the Rhondda valley. We came back to the midlands through Treorchy and over the mountain past Twr colliery, then the spectacular heads of the valleys road.

    Whilst the last Tory government did not exactly carry out the inappropriate actions of which finger wagging is one reaction, the wanton destruction of way of life by Thatcher in the valleys and their prevarication over miners coal dust compensation was near criminal as anything.

    My bro in laws cousins have a peculiarly inflected way of saying Thatcher that speaks volumes.

    Great trip in refreshing rain.

  7. When I worked at Pyramid Engineering Services from South London, the old SLEE company that did good stuff, China was concerntrated in our minds even then. I like the chinese, they gave a philosophy in life I like, and if you fancy a BMW, why not buy one of these instead, with its rocket UK road tax band,
    http://www.mg.co.uk/the-models/mg6-gt.aspx

  8. I am getting to like Dave, I truely am, he has something recently, talking sense within the the tory party. They seem, well, less fascist to tell you the truth. How long it will last is anyone’s guess, though.

  9. China’s growth in wealth and food production are even more important to themselves than they are to ‘all of us’.

    It’s a bit of a joke that Cameron even tries to claim any moral high ground, I really shouldn’t guess (admonishing others that do) but I doubt his family’s old money was made without the exploitation of people in many countries and wouldn’t be surprised to hear their current funds include some investment in Chinese gold.

    .

  10. If any one of our media commentators really gave a damn about Chinese people they would know that face is the most important thing in life.

    It’s quite shocking that for their own needs (sales and approval and – as can be seen easily below – some success in the popularity stakes) they would do their pose-y thing.

    There is far more likelihood of progress on human rights if things are handled discreetly; a person is far more likely to be co-operative if he is not shown up on foreign soil when making a trip we should all welcome.

    Cameron has a very easy demand he could make to our own side; every single buyer purchasing out of China should have to visit the actual production facility.  Most don’t, they buy through UK agents who source through HK agents.

    Cameron could have put the onus where at least part of it belongs.

  11. So – give him absolutely no credit for anything then ?  It’s that kind of tribalistic comment (unlike AC’s more balanced one) that turns people off, MicheleB.  With all due respect.

  12. What they say and what they do are very different things. Cameron is the PR part of the operation – it’s all he knows.

    Never forget, PR men sell you a positive, likeable message while quietly ripping you off with a crappy product. But if the message goes wrong and become tainted, they drop it like a stone and come up with a different tack somewhere else – hence Cameron’s U-turn tendency!

  13. It would be nice if Cameron didn’t demonise his own public sector workers instead of trying to play the tough guy.
    It would be nice too if Ed Milliband stood up for the people who voted for him for once.

  14. We in the UK can’t say too much, timewise – we only gave the women the vote in this country less than one hundred years ago, as well as colonial carrying-ons too around then. As long as China moves in the right direction in such matters, that is good enough for me. They look as if they will be coining it soon bigtime, and the walls will fall. What the heck are we going to do with ourselves is the main big question in decades coming, as Evan Davis mentions in his “Made in Britain” documentary series he is showing on BBC2 (Mondays) at the moment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Will AI End Humanity?

If there is even a 1% chance that AI could destroy us, should we keep building it? Are we creating machines that will one day outthink humanity? And is the race to dominate AI accelerating us toward a... Continue

15 January 2026

Post

Posted by Goalhanger

489. Musk’s AI Deepfake Disgrace & JD Vance’s Minnesota Lies (Question Time)

Will the UK ban 'X' over explicit, nonconsensual deepfake images of women and children generated using its AI tool? What does JD Vance's outburst against the Minnesota ICE shooting victim tell us abou... Continue

15 January 2026

Post

Posted by Goalhanger

488. Is Iran on the Edge of Revolution?

Could the Iran protests finally break the Supreme Leader’s brutal reign, or will the regime's deadly crackdown contain the unrest? If the US intervenes militarily, what would a Trump-style plan for ... Continue

13 January 2026

Post

Posted by Goalhanger

170. President of Moldova, Maia Sandu: Holding the Line Between Democracy and Putin

How did Maia Sandu fight Russian disinformation in Moldova? What is it like to have a war in the country next door? Will the European Union accept Moldova with Russian troops in the country?  Rory a... Continue

12 January 2026

Post

Posted by Goalhanger

China Vs USA: Who Will Win the AI Race?

Who really controls AI; governments, corporations, or no one at all? Is AI becoming a new kind of global arms race? And, can we keep humans in charge of systems that move faster than we do? Rory and ... Continue

8 January 2026

Post

Posted by Goalhanger

487. Is Starmer Rethinking His Approach to Europe? (Question Time)

What do Keir Starmer’s comments on 'closer alignment' with the EU single market actually mean? After the Bondi terror attack, how can a centrist government respond to national trauma without fuellin... Continue

8 January 2026

Post

Posted by Goalhanger

486. Does Maduro’s Capture Put Greenland at Risk?

Is Venezuela the start of something bigger? If this isn’t regime change, what does Trump actually want? And, has Trump just handed Putin a win?  Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all these ques... Continue

6 January 2026

Post

Posted by Goalhanger

169. Jimmy Wales: Wikipedia vs. Musk, AI, and the Battle for Truth

Who gave us an encyclopedia in our pockets? Why is the statement that Donald Trump is the "worst president in US history" allowed on his Wikipedia page? How do Brazilians and Americans differ on the... Continue

5 January 2026