488. Is Iran on the Edge of Revolution?
13 January 2026
Post
29 March 2010
3 minute(s) read
Recent Posts
488. Is Iran on the Edge of Revolution?
Could the Iran protests finally break the Supreme Leader’s brutal reign, or will the regime's deadly crackdown contain the unrest? If the US intervenes militarily, what would a Trump-style plan for ... Continue13 January 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
170. President of Moldova, Maia Sandu: Holding the Line Between Democracy and Putin
How did Maia Sandu fight Russian disinformation in Moldova? What is it like to have a war in the country next door? Will the European Union accept Moldova with Russian troops in the country? Rory a... Continue12 January 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
China Vs USA: Who Will Win the AI Race?
Who really controls AI; governments, corporations, or no one at all? Is AI becoming a new kind of global arms race? And, can we keep humans in charge of systems that move faster than we do? Rory and ... Continue8 January 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
487. Is Starmer Rethinking His Approach to Europe? (Question Time)
What do Keir Starmer’s comments on 'closer alignment' with the EU single market actually mean? After the Bondi terror attack, how can a centrist government respond to national trauma without fuellin... Continue8 January 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
486. Does Maduro’s Capture Put Greenland at Risk?
Is Venezuela the start of something bigger? If this isn’t regime change, what does Trump actually want? And, has Trump just handed Putin a win? Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all these ques... Continue6 January 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
169. Jimmy Wales: Wikipedia vs. Musk, AI, and the Battle for Truth
Who gave us an encyclopedia in our pockets? Why is the statement that Donald Trump is the "worst president in US history" allowed on his Wikipedia page? How do Brazilians and Americans differ on the... Continue5 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
485. Trump Says America will Run Venezuela
Trump has announced that Venezuela will now be run by Washington as US forces have captured Nicolás Maduro and taken him to stand trial in New York. After months of escalating tension, Trump launched... Continue3 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
1 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Not surprising that, with such an appalling record after 13 years in office, Labour and its ad agency are incapable of designing an effective poster for their discredited party.
I work in advertising and my colleagues and I are astonished to put it mildly that the Tories now have two agencies working alongside each other. As your diaries make very clear, political parties are not the easiest clients !!… and the agencies tend to do the work less for money than for prestige and profile. So the hiring of M and C Saatchi was pretty humiliating for Euro RSCG. It does however point to a real problem in strategy and I thik that is the reason there appear to be so many problems with their presentation – because the reality is not fixed
What is good about the defaced posters, online or real, is that when I see one of the real ones,undefaced, I think of some of the defaced ones. They do not get the modern world and modern comms
Sad to see Burnley go down to Blackburn yesterday. I do hope that Burnley’s relegation isn’t a harbinger for Labour’s relegation.
BTW, all this lightweight poster stuff is very amusing but what happened to policy?
Brilliant idea – shld get some great posters. Pity the ‘single thought’ in the brief for ad 1 is more kitchen sink than single-minded tho’ – am finding it v. tough!!!
I’m delighted by the idea of letting the supporters design the posters. It is such a good idea I wish I’d thought of it myself.
I think the Conservative party’s posters are being ridiculed partially because we know they have cost a fortune to make. As voters we are being preached at by those posters, told how we should think by the very rich.
The Labour campaign should be “ground up”. It should involve the people and respect them. Getting supporters to design the posters is a perfect way of achieving this. Also the idea itself demonstrates imagination whereas the Conservatives changing of advertising agency shows no imagination at all.
I think M&C Saatchi’s posters are about the best they could do given the circumstances, but, boy, are they basic. They are so basic when I first saw them I thought that maybe they were trying to make them as easy as possible for people to change the text.
I think the Conservatives have a problem attacking Brown which is that the public are saying “enough already” to Brown attacks. They are fed up with it and the more the Conservatives attack Brown in this personal manner the more people will start wanting to defend him.
I think this election should be called:
Election 2.0
My poster would have DC and Oik playing on a play station with the caption.
Division bell! “members are requested to vote on the motion in the next ten minutes”.
Picture of Osborne ,,,, this man will be in charge of your money, your schools, your hospitals … have I won yet?
Cute move by the Tories today but I don’t think the public believe they can deliver it. Darling has to take Osborne to the cleaners tonight
Patrick James – are you in fact AC’s shadow?Been following this blog for a few weeks and never heard such a sycophantic load of rubbish…
Your comment today smacks of jealously and defeatism…and AC aren’t pledge cards something from the past a bit Blue Peterish,cut from a cereal packet etc…
Once again Alastair you, and most of those who comment here, have missed the point. The new posters with pictures of the PM are not personal or nasty. They quite clearly point out valid home truths about his and Labour’s dreadful track record, whether on crime, education or the economy. On the other hand the petty jibes in Labour posters featuring Osborne are purely personal. And give up on the hackneyed line about Ashcroft’s money, it pales into insignifcance against Labour’s trade union financing.
Maybe just use the quote from the Welsh ex Labour MP who joined the Tories today. He seems to sum it up very well. Bung a piccie of yourself and Mandy up too. Sorted guvner.
Great to see Osborne on NICs today. Labour’s tax increase on income is wrong. A tax on jobs when the economy is in a poor state is plain wrong. We should be looking to encourage job growth. The fact he is aiming it at the low AND MIDDLE income earners is good to see. We all know that Labour will end up taxing those of us in the middle who have never reached the higher rate. There’s not enough of the higher earners to cover Labour’s debt and deficit crisis. You haven’t got the balls to take the tough decisions on public spending as your commentary keeps showing. You seem dishonest when talking about hospitals and schools when you know that you will have to cut public spending more than Thatcher.
The suggestion you had from Hamish Thompson is close to an idea I passed to my former MP (Mike Hall, very hard working and available to his constituents).
This was the concept of “Brand Cameron”, an aspirational product (of course) which comes in tins or cartons using a similar style to Campbell’s Soup (no relation) – Cameron instead of Campbell. The tins, when opened, are shown to be empty, and Brand Cameron turns out to be all aspiration and no substance.
You could also feature a slightly dodgy and circumferentially challenged salesman called Fat Eric, who shamelessly pushes Brand Cameron with his mildly patronising “Righteous Yorkie” attitude.
I’ve already sent my idea to Labour HQ: Entitled ‘The Tories’ Latest Masterpiece’: Cameron and Osbourne grin away as they parade their latest painting which says ‘Tory Manifesto 2010: Wrecking the Economic Recovery’.
I don’t have the kit to produce a poster.
Whatever the punchlines, let’s keep it positive!
Listened to cuddly Ken today on the Jeremy Vine show on the radio, he appeared as shadow business secretary but spent 95% of the time asking questions that should have been put to Osborne. A few clangers from him, he insisted that more teachers are’nt better for education. I thought that all tories sent their kids to grammar schools where they’re taught in classes of 10-15.
On the inheritence tax he stated that many working class people with houses worth over £300,000 would benefit from it. Not many people I know with houses worth that much in Manchester!
Finally he did speak about business mentioning James Dyson as a good example. Dyson closed his factory to move production abroad making 800 workers redundant.
just watched the tv debate between the chancellors… AD came of pretty well i thought and he made a good point early on about the lack of any real funding for osbournes national insurance idea. the one that probably came of best was vince cable though… Osbourne looked a bit stumped when he was told you’re number one tax policy is to reduce tax for the 3000 wealthiest estates!
I think this was a rare opportunity for AD to get a platform to make it clear to people what he has done to save the economy from much worse and i think people wil trust him…should see more of him i think.
How about putting out a poster detailing Labour’s major achievements over the last 13 years.
Pay for it by the word and you will not need ‘Ashcroft-type money’, it will cost F*** all.
As for the ‘people’s party’, perhaps ‘people on benefits party’ would be more suitable !
It has to involve a Tory “axe” imo.How about a spoof on Jack Nicholon’s axe in “The Shining” -with the headline “HERE’S TORY”! -weilded by Osborn and Cameron -coming down on Jobs -Public Services -The Recovery etc?
Everyone’s a “creative” eh?
Last nights debate – did anyone notice the bald headed smart guy nodding away when AD spoke like the proverbial nodding dog ! Im sure its the same dude who sat front row in the Chilcott enquiry when Blair spoke nodding away…is this the Labour secret weapon a nodding dog?