177. Olaf Scholz: Putin, Power, and Far-Right Populism
23 February 2026
Post
7 September 2010
177. Olaf Scholz: Putin, Power, and Far-Right Populism
Does the former German Chancellor think that Germany was wrong to rely on Russian gas in the run up to the war in Ukraine? What does Olaf Scholz think is behind the rise of the far-right Alternative f... Continue23 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
23 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
503. Andrew’s Arrest: What Next?
Why has the disgraced Andrew Mountbatten Windsor been arrested? How damaging is this unprecedented moment for the royal family? How effective was King Charles’ response? Join Alastair and the forme... Continue19 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
502. How Nigel Farage Gets Away With It (Question Time)
Why is Reform UK's leader not being properly challenged by the press, and how does he get away with it? What does this reveal about the international populist playbook? How can our democracies be bett... Continue19 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
176. How Close Are We To War With Iran? (Robert Malley)
How does the former US Special Representative for Iran think US-Iranian relations will improve? Is there a method to Trump’s madness when it comes to foreign policy? Why does Robert believe the “t... Continue16 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
501. Is Starmer Too Soft on Trump? Inside the Munich Security Conference
Why did Trump's Secretary of State Marco Rubio 'love bomb' Europe at the Munich Security Conference, and how did it compare to JD Vance's infamous 'enemy within' speech this time last year? Is Europe ... Continue16 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
13 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
500. Japan, China, and the Fight for Taiwan (Question Time)
Are Japan and China closer to conflict over Taiwan, after the landslide victory for Japan's 'Iron Lady', Sanae Takayichi? Does Trump’s crumbling American-Hispanic vote explain his extreme reaction t... Continue12 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
The lack of media coverage is depressing on two counts. It could be assumed that it stems from the fact that phone tapping is endemic in the press at large, rather than just the News of the World. Or it could be the Tory press machine at work again. Neither are terribly encouraging.
I agree with you, Alistair, that this shouldn’t become a mad cap dash to crucify Coulson in itself, but the questions around this are important and need answering. The Home Secretary cannot simply decide to ignore this because it’s above her pay grade, or however she wants to phrase it. It’s the best opportunity Labour have had so far in the life of the Coalition to expose their “new politics” as just the same old.
Not to mention the general hypocrisy; if this had been under Labour, the media and the Tories would have had the whole country baying for blood.
Spot on! It’s crazy how the media, police, and politicians are reacting. This needs to be sorted out and the sooner we have an actual inquiry the better it is.
Phone-hacking scandal is about privacy, not about party politics.
It is a well-known fact that other papers have done the same as NOTW.
Another reason why papers have been silent on this matter is that newspapers prefer to ignore each other´s exclusives.
They also fear retaliation.
Journalists lie and cheat. Nothing new in this.
According to the Guardian phone-hacking inquiry was abandoned to avoid upsetting police.
NOTW reporter was awarded £800,000 because of bullying. The source was – Andy Coulson!
After Mr Coulson was forced to resign from NOTW, William Hague supported him to get a job as a spin chief of the Tories. During the time Mr Coulson was an editor at NOTW, William Hague earned £200,000 a year by writing a column for NOTW…
If illegal surveillance is as widespread as some insiders claim, we are going to need more than piecemeal picking away at this and that incident. I wonder if it would be useful to have a media-wide amnesty, so that all hackers and tappers could come out and confess without risking jail. That will cleanse the Augean stables, and we can start again with new rules to protect privacy from hacking hacks. Is there any merit in this suggestion?
Why did your chums not sort all this out during their years in power after the original gaoling/resignation at the NOW?
Funny thing that: even two jags has found a voice, missing for so many years as Depty PM. He had no appetite for it for all those years. Er, um.
You are a laughing stock!
” Cantonesque ” missed out a “u ” there old boy !
Anyway – instead of as per usual going on very sadly about some sideshow why aren’t you blogging on the AV issue or the Labourleadership battle.
Interesting to note a very credible part of the Labour machine of recent past very wisely predicted that the new Leader won’t be PM…Thanks Bryan Gould your are missed.
We live in a Mediacracy, where media barons like Rupert Murdoch weald too much power even the police are scarred of him. He acts like a Mafia boss.
Ownership of British newspapers, television companies, and radio Stations needs to be radically changed. It SHOULD only be owned by British citizens resident in UK. Ideally by a Trust.
We live in a Mediacracy, where media barons like Rupert Murdoch weald too much power even the police are scarred of him. He acts like a Mafia boss.
Ownership of British newspapers, television companies, and radio Stations needs to be radically changed. It SHOULD only be owned by British citizens resident in UK. Ideally by a Trust.
The “nature of the UK media culture” is dictated to by its ownership, which is so concentrated it endangers our democracy. On Sunday I referred to Will Hutton’s Observer article about the “Berlusconisation of Britain” and his call for a media commission “to examine Britain’s media ownership and competition rules.”
The idea has given birth to a campaign on Twitter called DemocracyFail which is calling for a media commission to do precisely as Will Hutton suggests. The campaign needs followers to get off the ground and be properly debated at the party conferences. Alastair, I hope you will allow my request to you and others on Twitter to follow and DemocracyFail and get the ball rolling. Thanks.
It took years for the phone companies to take action after people were being mugged for their mobile phones – letting the thieves carry on using them.
Same principle – it’s the phone companies who should be getting their acts together to make a sales pitch on better security from hackers. Better than just “change your PIN” – printing details on monthly statements of when voicemail was accessed and the phone number used to access it.
(Obviously highlighting “number withheld” as well!)
None story. Yawn. Move on.
“If this had happened on Labour’s watch.” If it happened at all it did happen on Labour’s watch. Labour Ministers who now say they had doubts about the original police inquiry did nothing about those doubts when they had both the power and the responsibility. Why?
Anyone else catch the PMs terrible Rooney gag last night? Had a NOTW/Andy Coulson feel all over it……crass, selfish and lewd, it made Cameron look like a stupid posh boy trying to win favour and be “in touch”….which could not be further than the truth, of course….. !!!
And the selfish git would have totally ruined the game for all the people listening to him while recording the game to watch when they got home without knowing the score….I’d have lumped him just for that….