177. Olaf Scholz: Putin, Power, and Far-Right Populism
23 February 2026
Post
7 February 2011
177. Olaf Scholz: Putin, Power, and Far-Right Populism
Does the former German Chancellor think that Germany was wrong to rely on Russian gas in the run up to the war in Ukraine? What does Olaf Scholz think is behind the rise of the far-right Alternative f... Continue23 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
23 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
503. Andrew’s Arrest: What Next?
Why has the disgraced Andrew Mountbatten Windsor been arrested? How damaging is this unprecedented moment for the royal family? How effective was King Charles’ response? Join Alastair and the forme... Continue19 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
502. How Nigel Farage Gets Away With It (Question Time)
Why is Reform UK's leader not being properly challenged by the press, and how does he get away with it? What does this reveal about the international populist playbook? How can our democracies be bett... Continue19 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
176. How Close Are We To War With Iran? (Robert Malley)
How does the former US Special Representative for Iran think US-Iranian relations will improve? Is there a method to Trump’s madness when it comes to foreign policy? Why does Robert believe the “t... Continue16 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
501. Is Starmer Too Soft on Trump? Inside the Munich Security Conference
Why did Trump's Secretary of State Marco Rubio 'love bomb' Europe at the Munich Security Conference, and how did it compare to JD Vance's infamous 'enemy within' speech this time last year? Is Europe ... Continue16 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
13 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
500. Japan, China, and the Fight for Taiwan (Question Time)
Are Japan and China closer to conflict over Taiwan, after the landslide victory for Japan's 'Iron Lady', Sanae Takayichi? Does Trump’s crumbling American-Hispanic vote explain his extreme reaction t... Continue12 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
Ironically, by using the faux wraparound and mast head, mail have shown their true colours
Great to read a quote on the RTE News website by Noirin Hegarty, Editor of the Sunday Tribune – “The Mail On Sunday has shown in this act that it will leave no stone unturned in the race to the bottom.” Sums the Mail up entirely I think!
I’m choosy about what I read so I won’t touch the Mail in any form – it gives Journalism a bad name. Good blog and good luck today
ps can you blog about football a bit more
Fair play to you for your forthright words on Newstalk radio yesterday morning, Alastair. It was good to hear yourself and Roy Greenslade tell it like is from a UK media perspective. Though even you two sounded shocked by this stunt. Like many people in Ireland I was puzzled when I saw the Sunday Tribune masthead on a newsagent’s shelf – and in disbelief when I realised that this was an act of identity theft by the ‘Irish’ Mail. The Sunday Tribune has been the closest thing we Irish have had to The Observer – a quality Sunday that is not overwhelmingly rightwing. Its loss is just awful news for Irish journalism. Which makes the Mail’s stunt an act of pure cultural imperialism. Surely it must also be illegal? If something like this were to happen in the UK, what would the legal situation be?
When the News Chronicle folded we found the Daily Mail on the mat the next day. So what’s changed!
As you are in NI with its own somewhat complicated voting system I rather fancy going off topic with a discussion of AV.
EdM has, in my view, done the right thing by announcing today he’ll not appear with Clegg on a Yes platform.
On the other hand, like many other Socialists, I find myself stuck firmly as a “Don’t Know” on the issue.
At university we had elimination elections for union officers and we are used to it internally within the Labour party.
AV is very sensible – in the tweeds and brogues sense – because we end up with a successful candidate that at least half of the voters will have some truck with.
On the other hand, look at Australia where AV basically allows several notionally competing Tory parties not be in competition at all.
And on yet a third hand my late father found himself perfunctorily booted off the old West Midlands County council in the 1980’s when the Conservative agent cocked up his candidate’s nomination papers. All the Tories voted Liberal!
That said, the winning Liberal candidate David Luscombe was a very VERY good man and his decline through Multiple Sclerosis was a terrible loss to his party and to the citizens of Birmingham. I’d have had no problem giving him a second preference under AV.
Yes, EdM is absolutely correct to distance himself from Nick Clegg on this issue. It is much too important.
“Mail not welcome in most of England either”, you can safely say. However, It has become the Bible of middle England.
All of the “what the papers say” sections of TV progs slavishly give vent to the Mail “tosh” day after day. Many of the invited commentators on these shows are themselves journalists and writers who would love to take the Dacre shilling.
As for the new “Chuckle Brothers” of unlikely soulmates, I nominate “Two Jags” and Ian Hislop. You could not make it up!
Mr Nice, Howards Marks, and the film last year is an interesting insight to past troubles. Jim McCann and all that,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcum_pQjYK4
Dana, 1970, ok, Holland, and then they bombed us,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-A1L1lWeLA
Thank you for coming to QUB. I was in the university. Mr Campbell, if I may ask a question, a few times during your lecture you said ‘Never give up’, both in politics and as a rule in life. May I ask, is there such a thing as futility?
Personally, I’d rather he didn’t! Blog about football that is.
Agree with you about the Mail though.
I’m still in the “Don’t Know” camp regarding AV. Hoping that the whole issue may in due course become easier to make a decision on.
It gives humanity a bad name!
Perhaps we could kick this one around a bit?
You’re right!
I’m pleased you agree with me about the Mail, thanks 🙂
and regarding the football we all have different views!