Cameron with another panic move, Miliband on foreign policy, this is not the crossover Crosby predicted!

  • Post

  • 24 April 2015

  • Posted by Alastair Campbell

  • 9

So as to what utter calamity Ed Miliband would unleash upon us if he became Prime Minister, you can take your pick from the increasingly desperate right wing papers and the increasingly desperate right wing 'campaign' of David Cameron and Lynton Crosby. Cameron himself is in the Mail (forgetting how he has broken his 'kick me out if I don't' pledge on immigration numbers) saying Ed would have the immigrant hordes flocking in. Then George Osborne in the Sun wraps himself in the flag of St George to wheel out the Labour-SNP coalition lie as his party continues its effort to break up the UK after 300 years in the hope it might help get Dave a few more years using Chequers for chillaxing. The Telegraph picks out Digby Jones - one of the last government's errors I fear - to warn Labour would destroy enterprise. And the Times, alas increasingly succumbing to the Murdoch orders, has a few funny number predictions of economic ruin under Labour. And on and on it goes. Meanwhile lest anyone dare to say the Tories are only fighting a negative campaign against Labour, perish the thought, Cameron comes up with a new wheeze in the form of English only tax levels. Yeah, like that one has been planned for ages, honestly it has not been made up to fit the new 'strategy' of pitting England v Scotland, and as for why it was not in the now largely forgotten Tory manifesto, er, well, oh, er, it must have been a printing error. I have seen some dire campaigns in my time. Crosby's Michael Howard 2005 vintage springs to mind. But this one is taking all the awards for the direst. They are not so much making it up as they go along as going along not sure what they just made up. I am almost moved to feel sorry for Margaret Thatcher, laid to rest in the last Parliament, swirling around her grave wondering what happened to the great fighting machine for which the Tories were renowned. They say they have the economy on their side. If only they did not overcook it and pretend to claim some kind of modern British Wirtschaftwunder, people might buy it. They say they have leadership going for them but EU leaders who studied Dave at yesterday's 'not our fault guv' Mediterranean waters summit report he was nervous, edgy, not as confident as the last time he swept through Brussels, and in need of a haircut. Meanwhile, almost as if to illustrate the increasingly likely prospect of Cameron making way for Ed Miliband, despite the millions spent undermining him and the mega-tons of media print telling the public he is hopeless, today the Labour leader turns to foreign policy. It is one of the side effects of Britain's diminution on the world stage under Cameron that foreign policy has barely figured in this election. Yet the challenges and threats we face are as much international - or at least intertwined with challenges and threats faced by most counties - as domestic. Economic inequality, geostrategic shifts between East and West, climate change, nuclear proliferation, ISIS and terrorism more broadly, Russian aggression, global trade, these are issues that do not stop or start at any border. They affect us all. They are among the chief responsibilities of any democratic leader anywhere in the world. And of course Europe. I have had one or two people complain - it happened at a business event I did yesterday - that I have been too harsh on Cameron in this campaign. But if I look at just two things - his handling of Britain's position in Europe, and his handling of Scotland and the UK - I am afraid I feel it hard to garner any respect at all. I could respect Thatcher even though I hated a lot of what she did. But I cannot respect someone who is playing fire with nationalism, making him little better than a poor man's Sturgeon or Farage - and at least the SNP and UKIP leaders believe in their big causes. And I cannot respect someone who because of his failure to stand up to the nonsense arguments spouted by Farage, parts of the media and the right of the Tory Party, has led Britain to the margins of Europe. His only hope now, the economy, leadership and 'experience' having been jettisoned as strategic anchors, is that he can get UKIP voters to 'come home' by promising an EU referendum that even before a vote is cast is a disaster for the UK, because of the mayhem it will cause in the run up, and by pouring petrol on the fires of Scottish and now English nationalism. It is squalid and pathetic. It is not even worth calling it a campaign. No wonder, over in the last bastion of moderately reasonable news reporting, that the FT's front page tells of Tory business supporters' anger at the hapless Cameron campaign. Meanwhile the Ed Miliband who was going to collapse at the first sound of electoral gunfire is showing himself to be calm, resilient, focused, and today setting out an agenda for a foreign policy that can help to meet the challenges of our time. If you are watching the news tonight and you see Cameron bouncing around promising English only tax plans in front of yet another invited audience of Tories, and you see Ed Miliband at Chatham House talking of some of the threats and challenges above, I ask you to consider... have the Tories overestimated the appeal of Cameron and the talent of Crosby, and have they, to quote George Bush, misunderstimated Miliband? Off to a few Northern marginals today and tomorrow, ahead of the most important event happening anywhere on the planet tomorrow. Burnley v Leicester, 3pm. The definition of a six pointer. Squeaky bum time. Not sure if they had squeaky bum time at Eton and St Paul's. But Cameron and Osborne are in it now, clock ticking.

9 responses to “Cameron with another panic move, Miliband on foreign policy, this is not the crossover Crosby predicted!”

  1. We need someone trailing around behind each member of coalition so that every time they annynce what they’ve been busy doing :-
    fixing economy
    deficit halved
    jobs up
    growth up
    a little echo can trill in with ‘but what about INTERnational DEBT?’
    ie: Doubled (and still gathering interest).

    Apparently the little list above is what Vince and Danny are bragging about – Messrs Clean have become sly messers.

    Squeaky bum?

    • Ahem, that needed a note ‘PS:’ to hint that my last line was referring to the OP = and not the two messers recently mentioned!

  2. “They are not so much making it up as they go along as going along not sure what they just made up.” Superb!!!!

  3. Chatham house was a serious foreign policy speech for serious times and serious people, a proper framework. Thought provoking in depth and important.

    I think it scared Cameron and Crosby to death – it is a big step in terms of completing Ed as a Statesman, an area where in the past few years he has said too little but seems to have thought a lot.

    That Cameron panic means they have falsely claimed it was a personal attack – the best way to combat that is to push the speech more, Ed should make foreign policy the key issue on more days.

  4. What a fantastic piece of writing Alistair. I 100% agree with everything you said. Cameron & his campaign team have made a critical error – they were complacent at the very beginning & lazy believing the electorate would believe the spin about Miliband. How wrong they were. The whole campaign is failing because they seriously underestimated Miliband and I really believe it will be a fatal mistake come 7th May. They are running a ‘ campaign’ (very loose interpretation) on a caricature of Miliband and NOT Miliband himself.

  5. I am doing my best as “foreign secretary”, with that “special relationship” with the USA. My animal vet love, Mary from Texas, sadly a 39 year old widow, cancer, three kiddies, and remarkably for there, a true Dem. ; ) Vid I did for her last night, a bit of Matt Monro, and I made her blush again.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbLRbgdAZgc

    And oh yes, HSBC, my bank for personal stuff, has given Cameron a kick in the teeth because of his EU in-out, shake it all about, feckless flannel.

Leave a Reply to invisibletouch5094 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

177. Olaf Scholz: Putin, Power, and Far-Right Populism

Does the former German Chancellor think that Germany was wrong to rely on Russian gas in the run up to the war in Ukraine? What does Olaf Scholz think is behind the rise of the far-right Alternative f... Continue

23 February 2026

Post

Posted by Goalhanger

Why Trump Wants Greenland

Why has Donald Trump considered invading Greenland? How does he think it will benefit him? What is the role of China in the Arctic? And what animals have Russia trained to spy for them? Listen as Alas... Continue

23 February 2026

Post

Posted by Goalhanger

503. Andrew’s Arrest: What Next?

Why has the disgraced Andrew Mountbatten Windsor been arrested? How damaging is this unprecedented moment for the royal family? How effective was King Charles’ response? Join Alastair and the forme... Continue

19 February 2026

Post

Posted by Goalhanger

502. How Nigel Farage Gets Away With It (Question Time)

Why is Reform UK's leader not being properly challenged by the press, and how does he get away with it? What does this reveal about the international populist playbook? How can our democracies be bett... Continue

19 February 2026

Post

Posted by Goalhanger

176. How Close Are We To War With Iran? (Robert Malley)

How does the former US Special Representative for Iran think US-Iranian relations will improve? Is there a method to Trump’s madness when it comes to foreign policy? Why does Robert believe the “t... Continue

16 February 2026

Post

Posted by Goalhanger

501. Is Starmer Too Soft on Trump? Inside the Munich Security Conference

Why did Trump's Secretary of State Marco Rubio 'love bomb' Europe at the Munich Security Conference, and how did it compare to JD Vance's infamous 'enemy within' speech this time last year? Is Europe ... Continue

16 February 2026

Post

Posted by Goalhanger

The Battle for the Arctic

One of the most important political issues of our time - the battle for the Arctic. Why is Russia so dominant there? Why does Trump really want Greenland? And why is Climate Change right at the heart ... Continue

13 February 2026

Post

Posted by Goalhanger

500. Japan, China, and the Fight for Taiwan (Question Time)

Are Japan and China closer to conflict over Taiwan, after the landslide victory for Japan's 'Iron Lady', Sanae Takayichi? Does Trump’s crumbling American-Hispanic vote explain his extreme reaction t... Continue

12 February 2026

Post

Posted by Goalhanger