177. Olaf Scholz: Putin, Power, and Far-Right Populism
23 February 2026
Post
26 March 2011
177. Olaf Scholz: Putin, Power, and Far-Right Populism
Does the former German Chancellor think that Germany was wrong to rely on Russian gas in the run up to the war in Ukraine? What does Olaf Scholz think is behind the rise of the far-right Alternative f... Continue23 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
23 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
503. Andrew’s Arrest: What Next?
Why has the disgraced Andrew Mountbatten Windsor been arrested? How damaging is this unprecedented moment for the royal family? How effective was King Charles’ response? Join Alastair and the forme... Continue19 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
502. How Nigel Farage Gets Away With It (Question Time)
Why is Reform UK's leader not being properly challenged by the press, and how does he get away with it? What does this reveal about the international populist playbook? How can our democracies be bett... Continue19 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
176. How Close Are We To War With Iran? (Robert Malley)
How does the former US Special Representative for Iran think US-Iranian relations will improve? Is there a method to Trump’s madness when it comes to foreign policy? Why does Robert believe the “t... Continue16 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
501. Is Starmer Too Soft on Trump? Inside the Munich Security Conference
Why did Trump's Secretary of State Marco Rubio 'love bomb' Europe at the Munich Security Conference, and how did it compare to JD Vance's infamous 'enemy within' speech this time last year? Is Europe ... Continue16 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
13 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
500. Japan, China, and the Fight for Taiwan (Question Time)
Are Japan and China closer to conflict over Taiwan, after the landslide victory for Japan's 'Iron Lady', Sanae Takayichi? Does Trump’s crumbling American-Hispanic vote explain his extreme reaction t... Continue12 February 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
Your empathy with marches knows no bounds. Those against The Iraq War, and of the Countryside Alliance were many times larger than today’s is expected to be: You briefed against them both!
Social and economic vulnerability impacting ordinary people have origins in the global concentration of wealth and power. A global economic system is exploiting labour and concentrating profits and creating inequality.
Governments in liberal democracies feel free to ignore mass demonstrations, while in the Arab world they cannot. “Managed” democracies can avoid the apperance of suppression while sustantively terminating democracy.
Both capitalist democracies and dictatorships use political means to concentrate wealth, power and privilege. Britain has policies of destroying public services without a clear mandate.
Priority is given to the entitlement of the few at the expense of the many.
In the Arab world people want break with existing models of power and privilege – they do not simply want westernisation.
It is about taking the ownership of their societies.
People in the west should join this rebellion against corporate power and privilege. As Priyamvada Gopal wrote in the Guardian, this is about more fundamental clash between the barbarism of economic plutocracy and the civilisation of social justice.
Neoliberal policies should have no place in the post-crash world.
Leaving everything to the markets did not work. The free-market ideology which followed Keynesian economics was funded by rightwing thinktanks.
In the developing world, neoliberalism was translated into the Washington Consensus. The experiment started in 1970s Chile. Inflation rose to 375% and unemployment to almost 30%. Inequality followed and debt exploded.
Private sector options were pushed because of ideology.
In Britain the government is slashing jobs and dismantling welfare system to balance the budget. But the cuts will lead to a spiral of slow growth and high unemployment. New cuts and tax rises are then needed.
The deficit was caused by massive bank bailout, shrinking government revenues and decline in corporate taxation. Maintaining public spending is needed for long-term support to economy.
Social movements are fighting the dogma of austerity and privatisation. The legacy of the Chicago School is invading the last battleground for social justice.
Seven out of 10 people in Britain define themselves as middle class. But the truth is that social mobility has faltered.
Main political parties think that the idea of aspiration is a vote-winner. But in a globalised economy aspirations cannot be met.
What we buy, rather than what we produce, has become our core identity.
Triangulation under New Labour meant that there was no more need for class conflict.
We now have some homogenised vision of middle-classness.
Gramsci described a culture in which the ruling class persuades the lower classes to accept its values. Rush to the “centre ground” means that.
The future of the Labour party lies in the synthesis of New Labour and Blue Labour.
New Labour´s way of staying true to Labour values was public sector and welfare spending.
Labour now needs to recreate the coaliton of middle-class and working-class voters that gave the victory in 1997.
Blue Labour, meaning conservative social democracy with emphasis on the good society and moral economy based on fairness, is the only way “New” Labour can continue after the global financial crisis.
This new thinking will get Labour elected.
If a person with a large mortgage loses their job – what’s their first priority?
Either securing a new job (including borrowing some more money for training etc) or concentrating on making additional mortgage payments to reduce their debt?
We need to grow our way of of this recession – not cut our way out.
Good luck to all on the march!
250,000 people? Wow, pretty awesome. Did a good job in demonstrating to the government that there are many who oppose them. Shame about the violence.
I was at that dinner. The auction was a crashing embarassment for the enitre room due to the thunderous lack of bids. However you really should speak to SOSCA. Actually telling attendees in advance that there would be a charity auction or in fact mentioning in advance that there would be any kind of charitable presencen would have been an enormous help to the fundraising activity. Great speech mind, but then I suspect I was the only red in the room!