Will AI End Humanity?
15 January 2026
Post
26 March 2011
3 minute(s) read
Recent Posts
15 January 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
489. Musk’s AI Deepfake Disgrace & JD Vance’s Minnesota Lies (Question Time)
Will the UK ban 'X' over explicit, nonconsensual deepfake images of women and children generated using its AI tool? What does JD Vance's outburst against the Minnesota ICE shooting victim tell us abou... Continue15 January 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
488. Is Iran on the Edge of Revolution?
Could the Iran protests finally break the Supreme Leader’s brutal reign, or will the regime's deadly crackdown contain the unrest? If the US intervenes militarily, what would a Trump-style plan for ... Continue13 January 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
170. President of Moldova, Maia Sandu: Holding the Line Between Democracy and Putin
How did Maia Sandu fight Russian disinformation in Moldova? What is it like to have a war in the country next door? Will the European Union accept Moldova with Russian troops in the country? Rory a... Continue12 January 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
China Vs USA: Who Will Win the AI Race?
Who really controls AI; governments, corporations, or no one at all? Is AI becoming a new kind of global arms race? And, can we keep humans in charge of systems that move faster than we do? Rory and ... Continue8 January 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
487. Is Starmer Rethinking His Approach to Europe? (Question Time)
What do Keir Starmer’s comments on 'closer alignment' with the EU single market actually mean? After the Bondi terror attack, how can a centrist government respond to national trauma without fuellin... Continue8 January 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
486. Does Maduro’s Capture Put Greenland at Risk?
Is Venezuela the start of something bigger? If this isn’t regime change, what does Trump actually want? And, has Trump just handed Putin a win? Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all these ques... Continue6 January 2026
Posted by Goalhanger
169. Jimmy Wales: Wikipedia vs. Musk, AI, and the Battle for Truth
Who gave us an encyclopedia in our pockets? Why is the statement that Donald Trump is the "worst president in US history" allowed on his Wikipedia page? How do Brazilians and Americans differ on the... Continue5 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Your empathy with marches knows no bounds. Those against The Iraq War, and of the Countryside Alliance were many times larger than today’s is expected to be: You briefed against them both!
Social and economic vulnerability impacting ordinary people have origins in the global concentration of wealth and power. A global economic system is exploiting labour and concentrating profits and creating inequality.
Governments in liberal democracies feel free to ignore mass demonstrations, while in the Arab world they cannot. “Managed” democracies can avoid the apperance of suppression while sustantively terminating democracy.
Both capitalist democracies and dictatorships use political means to concentrate wealth, power and privilege. Britain has policies of destroying public services without a clear mandate.
Priority is given to the entitlement of the few at the expense of the many.
In the Arab world people want break with existing models of power and privilege – they do not simply want westernisation.
It is about taking the ownership of their societies.
People in the west should join this rebellion against corporate power and privilege. As Priyamvada Gopal wrote in the Guardian, this is about more fundamental clash between the barbarism of economic plutocracy and the civilisation of social justice.
Neoliberal policies should have no place in the post-crash world.
Leaving everything to the markets did not work. The free-market ideology which followed Keynesian economics was funded by rightwing thinktanks.
In the developing world, neoliberalism was translated into the Washington Consensus. The experiment started in 1970s Chile. Inflation rose to 375% and unemployment to almost 30%. Inequality followed and debt exploded.
Private sector options were pushed because of ideology.
In Britain the government is slashing jobs and dismantling welfare system to balance the budget. But the cuts will lead to a spiral of slow growth and high unemployment. New cuts and tax rises are then needed.
The deficit was caused by massive bank bailout, shrinking government revenues and decline in corporate taxation. Maintaining public spending is needed for long-term support to economy.
Social movements are fighting the dogma of austerity and privatisation. The legacy of the Chicago School is invading the last battleground for social justice.
Seven out of 10 people in Britain define themselves as middle class. But the truth is that social mobility has faltered.
Main political parties think that the idea of aspiration is a vote-winner. But in a globalised economy aspirations cannot be met.
What we buy, rather than what we produce, has become our core identity.
Triangulation under New Labour meant that there was no more need for class conflict.
We now have some homogenised vision of middle-classness.
Gramsci described a culture in which the ruling class persuades the lower classes to accept its values. Rush to the “centre ground” means that.
The future of the Labour party lies in the synthesis of New Labour and Blue Labour.
New Labour´s way of staying true to Labour values was public sector and welfare spending.
Labour now needs to recreate the coaliton of middle-class and working-class voters that gave the victory in 1997.
Blue Labour, meaning conservative social democracy with emphasis on the good society and moral economy based on fairness, is the only way “New” Labour can continue after the global financial crisis.
This new thinking will get Labour elected.
If a person with a large mortgage loses their job – what’s their first priority?
Either securing a new job (including borrowing some more money for training etc) or concentrating on making additional mortgage payments to reduce their debt?
We need to grow our way of of this recession – not cut our way out.
Good luck to all on the march!
250,000 people? Wow, pretty awesome. Did a good job in demonstrating to the government that there are many who oppose them. Shame about the violence.
I was at that dinner. The auction was a crashing embarassment for the enitre room due to the thunderous lack of bids. However you really should speak to SOSCA. Actually telling attendees in advance that there would be a charity auction or in fact mentioning in advance that there would be any kind of charitable presencen would have been an enormous help to the fundraising activity. Great speech mind, but then I suspect I was the only red in the room!